Neal v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
October 2017
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Anders v. California · Faretta v. California · McCoy v. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, District 1 · 503 So. 2d 321 - State v. Causey · 274 So. 2d 256 - Nelson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In Neal , we stated, [T]he trial court’s failure to reiterate an offer of appointed counsel to Appellant at the beginning of the sentencing hearing does not require reversal of the judgment and sentence due to the presence of standby counsel and Appellant’s frequent consultation with her during the proceedings. Knight [v. State], 770 So.2d [663, 670 (Fla.2000)]; Brown [v. State], 113 So.3d [134,142 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013) ].”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Howard v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.