Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 142 SW 102 - Hoefling v. Thulemeyer

Hoefling v. Thulemeyer’s Empirical Analysis

1911

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
February 1931
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently February 1931

7 state decisions

40191119201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Zwernemann v. Rosenberg · Blinn v. McDonald · Moore Son v. Moore · Childers v. D. J. Henderson & Co. · Roots v. Robertson, Administrator

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “And all pretended sales of the homestead involving any condition of defeasance shall be void.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.