Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 142 Vt. 525 - Legault v. Legault

Legault v. Legault’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
2
states following
March 2021
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 4 district · 27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently March 2021 · most notably Dj Painting, Inc. v. Baraw Enterprises, Inc. (2001), In re Relafen Antitrust Litigation (2004)

2 federal appellate · 4 district · 27 state decisions

11019831990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Board of Highway Commissioners v. City of Bloomington · Peyton v. William C. Peyton Corp. · Springer v. Springer · Wells v. Village of Orleans, Inc. · Ball v. State of New York

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he equitable doctrine of unjust enrichment rests upon the principle that a man shall not be allowed to enrich himself unjustly at the expense of another. In other words, the inquiry is whether, in light of the totality of circumstances, it is against equity and good conscience to allow [a party] to retain what is sought to be recovered. Thus, whether there is unjust enrichment may not be determined from a limited inquiry confined to an isolated transaction. It must be a realistic determination based on a broad view of the human setting involved.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.