¶1 (Concurring) — While the offer of proof was too broad, as pointed out by the majority, yet in view of the previous ruling, I think it was the duty of the .trial court to indicate to counsel a willingness to admit evidence as to that part of the offer which was proper.
142 Wash. 391
253 P 452
Wendell v. Brown
Decided February 18, 1927
Washington Supreme Court · decided 1927-02-18
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently September 1955
2 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1927-02-18
View the full empirical analysis of this case →