Simonds v. Noland’s Empirical Analysis
1927
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Kom v. Cody Detective Agency, Inc. · Duddy-Robinson Co. v. Taylor · State Ex Rel. Howland v. Olympia Veneer Co. · Krisch v. Inter-State Fisheries Co. · Yeaton v. Eagle Oil & Refining Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“* * * It has been often held that such a contract made by a corporation for the repurchase from an original subscriber to its capital stock is against public policy, ultra vires, and unenforceable (Rem. Comp. Stat. § 3823 [P. C. § 4524], as amended by Laws 1923, p. 543, § 2; Kom v. Cody Detective Agency, 76 Wash. 540 , 136 P. 1155 [50 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1073]; Duddy-Robinson Co. v. Taylor, 137 Wash. 304 , 242 P. 21 ; State ex rel. Howland v. Olympia Veneer Co., 138 Wash. 144 , 244 P. 261 ).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Culbertson's
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.