Haley v. Highland’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
11 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 39 Wash. App. 298 - Christie-Lambert Van & Storage Co. v. McLeod · 20 Wash. App. 229 - Sims v. Kiro, Inc. · 60 Wash. App. 426 - MacKey v. AMERICAN FASHION INSTITUTE · 25 Wash. App. 486 - Northside Auto Service, Inc. v. Consumers United Insurance · 62 Wash. App. 712 - Wilkerson v. United Investment, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The trial de novo shall be conducted as though no arbitration proceeding had occurred. No reference shall be made to the arbitration award, in any pleading, brief, or other written or oral statement to the trial court or jury either before or during the trial, nor, in a jury trial, shall the jury be informed that there has been an arbitration proceeding.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Haley v. Highland“But we need not adopt the Wilkerson approach to determine Haley improved his position at the trial de novo. Nothing in MAR 7.3 precludes consideration of attorney fees or costs awarded at a trial de novo when determining whether a party improved his or her position. The plain, unambiguous language of MAR 7.3 provides:”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Haley v. Highland“Enclosed is a declaration for attorney fees for Plaintiffs. It includes all amounts through Thursday, April 27, 1995. It includes blanks for the remaining time through the completion of the arbitration hearing and for the bottom line total. At the hearing, I will complete the blanks and sign the declaration.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Haley v. Highland
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.