State v. Cronin’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 39 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · 94 Wash. 2d 216 - State v. Green · 98 Wash. 2d 484 - State v. McCullum · State v. Roberts
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A person who is an accomplice in the commission of a crime is guilty of that crime whether present at the scene or not. A person is an accomplice in the commission of a crime if, with knowledge that it will promote or facilitate the commission of a crime, he or she either: (1) solicits, commands, encourages, or requests another person to commit the crime; or (2) aids or agrees to aid another person in planning or committing a crime.”
17 later decisions quote this exact passage“' does not necessarily mean that accomplice liability attaches for any and all offenses ultimately committed by the principal.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage“[A] conviction cannot stand if the jury was instructed in a manner that would relieve the State of this burden.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Recuenco · State v. Feeser
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.