Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 142 Wis. 2d 425 - Tucker v. Marcus

142 Wis. 2d 425 - Tucker v. Marcus’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

86
cited by 86 later decisions
5
states following
May 2024
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 77 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 86 later decisions — most recently May 2024 · most notably 206 Wis. 2d 158 - Management Computer Services, Inc. v. Hawkins, Ash, Baptie & Co. (1996), 197 Wis. 2d 365 - Weiss v. United Fire & Casualty Co. (1995)

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 77 state decisions

34019881990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 13 Cal. 3d 804 - Nga Li v. Yellow Cab Co. · Bateman Eichler, Hill Richards, Inc. v. Berner · 97 Wis. 2d 260 - Wangen v. Ford Motor Co. · Fort Worth Elevators Co. v. Russell · Bielski v. Schulze

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 86 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'[Alward' means 'a remedy recoverable in accordance with an order for judgment, not the amount of compensatory damages initially determined by the jury.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A general and perhaps almost universally accepted rule is that punitive damages cannot be awarded in the absence of actual damage.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[P]unitive damages are not available where there has been no `award' of actual damages.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.