Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 142 Wis. 2d 95 - Meas v. Young

142 Wis. 2d 95 - Meas v. Young’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
July 2014
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently July 2014

10 state decisions

801987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Exxon Corporation v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue · Prentice v. North American Title Guaranty Corp. · 90 Wis. 2d 700 - Department of Revenue v. Exxon Corp. · 26 Wis. 2d 306 - Baker v. Northwestern National Casualty Co. · 8 Wis. 2d 557 - Stevenson v. Barwineck

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]f [the] plaintiff incurred such expenditures and costs in collateral litigation as a necessary and proximate result of the deceit, they are recoverable as part of the damages sustained by him.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “where the wrongful acts of the defendant have involved the plaintiff in litigation with others, or placed him in such relation with others as to make it necessary to incur expense to protect his interest.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.