¶1Judgment of the Municipal Court affirmed, with costs, on the ground that it appears by the testimony of plaintiff that he had executed an assignment of the claim constituting the cause of action, and there was no proof of any reassignment thereof to him. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Woodward and Rich, JJ., concurred.
143 A.D. 912
Burke v. Westphal
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 15, 1911
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1911-02-15
Decided 1911-02-15