¶1On the trial of this action numerous errors were committed in the exclusion of evidence offered by the plaintiff. Some of them, if taken alone, might be considered as harmless, but they were so numerous, and so continuous, that the mass of them cannot be overlooked by this court'. Particular attention may be called to the rulings and exceptions shown in the record at folios 71, 72, 75, 70, 89, 102, 123, 145, 146,162, 163, 177, 188, 190, 191, 205, 222, 240, 265, 266, 267, 371, 273, 279, 281, 282, 283, 386, 389. The judgment and order should be *937reversed and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event. Jenks, P. J., Thomas and Carr, JJ., concurred; Burr and Rich, JJ., dissented. Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event.
143 A.D. 936
Jones v. Smith
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 15, 1911
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1911-03-15
Appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment of the Supreme Court, entered in the clerk’s office of Queens county on June 9, 1910, and from an order entered in said office on July 12, 1910, denying her motion fbr a new trial.
Decided 1911-03-15