State v. Meeker’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
51 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently May 2024 · most notably State v. Gonzales (1995), State v. Gerlaugh (1985)
51 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Tollett v. Henderson · Parker v. North Carolina · Tison v. Arizona · E. I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Maloney
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We find no requirement for “in court identifications” that the accused be surrounded by persons nearly identical in appearance. Furthermore, merely [having] a sign stating “defense” is not unduly suggestive.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hummert“[d]isagreements as to trial strategy or errors in trial [tactics] will not support a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel as long as the challenged conduct could have some reasoned basis.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Smith
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.