Davis v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
2 district · 26 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently March 2012 · most notably Gorman v. City of Phoenix (1987), Haroutunian v. Valueoptions, Inc. (2008)
2 district · 26 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Rodgers v. Watt · Webb v. Erickson · De Gryse v. De Gryse · Buckeye Cellulose Corp. v. Braggs Electric Construction Co. · In Re the Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Action No. S-933
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“any other reason justifying relief from the operation of the judgment.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Jepson v. New · State v. Jackson“[k]nowledge of the pendency of judgment and notice of entry of judgment cannot ... be equated”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“exercised in clear violation of the [relevant] principles”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.