Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 143 B.R. 424 - In Re Gregory

In Re Gregory’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
September 2016
most recently cited

2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently September 2016

2 district ·

100199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1302 · 11 U.S.C. § 1322 · 11 U.S.C. § 1325 · 11 U.S.C. § 1326 · 26 U.S.C. § 6672 · 28 U.S.C. § 586 (§ 224 of the Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978 (Title 11))

Relies on Foster v. Heitkamp · In Re Evans · In Re Ballard · Aberegg 13 Mishler · Matter of Harris

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Whether the debt is modified by the plan, the sophistication of the creditor, the ability and incentive of the creditor to monitor payments, whether the debt is a commercial or consumer debt, the ability of the debtor to reorganize absent direct payments, whether the payment cannot be delayed, the number of payments proposed to satisfy a claim, whether a direct payment by debtor under the plan will impair the trustee’s ability to perform his/her standing trustee duties, and unique or special circumstances of a particular case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.