In re Parrotte’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1201 · 11 U.S.C. § 522 · 28 U.S.C. § 1334 · 28 U.S.C. § 157
Relies on In the Matter of Ronald and Marjorie Pattersons Appeal of Abbotsford State Bank · Credithrift of America, Inc. v. Dubrock (In Re Dubrock) · In Re Gary Thompson and Randalyn Thompsonss Appeal of Abbotsford State Bank · Heape v. Citadel Bank of Independence · Walkington v. Production Credit Ass'n (In Re Walkington)
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“one cow, two goats, 10 sheep, 10 chickens, and feed sufficient to keep the cow, goats, sheep or chickens through one winter.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“A motor vehicle may be a tool of the trade if it is necessary to and is used by the debtor to carry on his trade.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“approach[ ] the very essence of a [dairy farmer's] trade.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.