Johnson v. Alexis’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
March 2008
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Bell v. Burson · MacKey v. Montrym · John McDonald v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts · 25 Cal. 3d 142 - People v. Frierson · 57 Cal. 2d 167 - DiGenova v. State Board of Education
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“That this was an existing, important protectable [sic] right there can be no doubt (see Mackey v. Montrym, 443 U.S. 1, 10 , 99 S.Ct. 2612, 2617 , 61 L.Ed.2d 321 , for procedural due process purposes, suspension of a driver’s license for statutorily defined cases implicates a protectable [sic] property interest; Bell v. Burson, 402 U.S. 535, 539 , 91 S.Ct. 1586, 1589 , 29 L.Ed.2d 90 , same; Berlinghieri v. Department of Motor Vehicles, 33 Cal.3d 392, 398 , 188 Cal.Rptr. 891 , 657 P.2d 383 , for purpose of independent judgment review standard, driver’s license suspension has impact on the individual sufficiently vital to compel full and independent review).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Minero v. Dominguez
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.