Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 143 Colo. 373 - Baumgartner v. Schey

Baumgartner v. Schey’s Empirical Analysis

1960

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
3
states following
October 2024
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently October 2024

20 state decisions

601960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Whitehead v. Callahan · French v. Golston

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““When a proceeding under this act involves the determination of an issue of fact, such issue may be tried and determined in the same manner as issues of fact are tried and determined in other civil actions in the court in which the proceeding is pending.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““It is, therefore, clear that if plaintiffs action had not been brought under the Declaratory Judgments Act prior to the end of the lease period it would have been an action in ejectment or forcible entry and detainer and in either ease would have been an action at law. Thus, the character of the action, the entire controversy, is one at law, and one entitling defendants to a trial by jury of issues of fact.” Baumgartner v. Schey, supra, 143 Colo. at 380 , 353 P.2d at 378 .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “If the action in which declaratory relief is sought would have been an action at law had it been permitted to mature without the intervention of declaratory procedure, the right to trial by jury of disputed questions of fact is not affected.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.