Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 143 CONN 159 - Swanson v. Boschen

Swanson v. Boschen’s Empirical Analysis

1956

Citation profile

54
cited by 54 later decisions
2
states following
May 2010
most recently cited

2 district · 52 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently May 2010 · most notably Ford v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Connecticut, Inc. (1990), Associated Investment Co. Ltd. Partnership v. Williams Associates IV (1994)

2 district · 52 state decisions

2101956196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. · Arnstein v. Porter · Woods v. Stone · Dawson v. Town of Orange · Linahan v. Linahan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “substantially of the same nature or is such an issue as prior to 1818 would have been triable to jury”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]he right of trial by jury shall remain inviolate.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Appeals from probate involving the validity of a will or paper purporting to be such, appeals from the doings of commissioners on insolvent estates, and, except as hereinafter provided, civil actions involving such an issue of fact, as, prior to January 1, 1880, would not present a question properly cognizable in equity.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.