Sadd v. Heim’s Empirical Analysis
1956
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 2 district · 36 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently March 2001 · most notably Connecticut Bank & Trust Co. v. Carriage Lane Associates (1991), Dart & Bogue Co. v. Slosberg (1987)
6 federal appellate · 2 district · 36 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Beach v. Osborne · Matz v. Arick · Pettibone v. Griswold · Hart v. Chalker · Andrews v. Connecticut Properties, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““THE CONDITION OF THIS DEED is such that whereas the Grantor is justly indebted to the Grantee in the amount of ONE MILLION FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS ($1,450,000.00) by virtue of its promissory note of even date with this instrument, by which note, for value received, the Grantor promises to pay to the order of the Grantee said sum with interest at the rate of ten (10) percent per annum from the date of said note, payable upon the unpaid principal balance until fully paid.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“if it is intended to secure an unascertained debt, such data must be set out with respect to that debt as will put anyone interested in the inquiry upon a track leading to discovery.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“determine the full amount of the debts due. . . . on both notes and fix one law day for them to redeem upon paying that determined indebtedness. . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.