Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 143 CONN 9 - Proctor v. Sachner

Proctor v. Sachner’s Empirical Analysis

1955

Citation profile

58
cited by 58 later decisions
5
states following
April 2002
most recently cited

2 district · 56 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 58 later decisions — most recently April 2002 · most notably Anderson v. Ludgin (1978), Tough v. Ives (1972)

2 district · 56 state decisions

160195519601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hurtado v. People of the State of California · Dohany v. Rogers · State of Missouri Hurwitz v. North · German v. German · 125 Cal. App. 2d 154 - Smith v. Smith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “While the word `similar' has at times been construed as synonymous with `same' or `identical' its usual significance is that contained in Webster's New International Dictionary (2d Ed.): `Nearly corresponding; resembling in many respects; somewhat like; having a general likeness.' The word as ordinarily used implies an allowance for some degree of difference. McLaughlin v. Poucher, 127 Conn. 441 , 446 , 17 A.2d 767 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[i]ts requirements are satisfied if [a party] has reasonable notice and reasonable opportunity to be heard and to present his claim or defense, due regard being had to the nature of the proceeding and the character of the rights which may be affected by it.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.