The Eugene F. Moran’s Empirical Analysis
143 F. 187 · 1906
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 4 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently December 1930
2 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on The Lyndhurst · White v. Peshtigo Co. · The Nettie L. Tice · Sherborne v. The N. & W. No. 4 · The Maling
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““I think that both the Moran and the scows were in fault for not having up lights on the scows. * * * The authorities establish that, under those circumstances, it was the duty of the master of the’ tug and the men on the scows to see to it that the lights required by law to be on the tow were in, place, and-lighted:””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. The Protector
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.