Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 143 F.1d 560 - Parker v. Black

Parker v. Black’s Empirical Analysis

143 F. 560 · 1906

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
December 1931
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 5 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 1931

4 federal appellate · 5 district ·

501906191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Fred Bardes v. First National Bank of Hawarden Iowa · Pirie v. Chicago Title & Trust Co. · In re Eggert · Jones v. Bolles · Benedict v. . Deshel

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““That the trustee acted within his right in instituting a plenary action for an accounting, instead of restoring to an action at law, seems to be settled by the federal authorities. * * * It will be noted that the language employed in the same sentence includes suits to set aside fraudulent conveyances and suits for the recovery of money paid by the bankrupt to third persons. This would seem to indicate that the Supreme Court regarded the payment of money to a creditor -or third person in violation of the bankruptcy act as in the nature of a fraud, misrepresentation, or concealment, and that a remedy in equity would more readily afford adequate relief. Jones v. Bolles, 9 Wall. 364 [ 19 L. Ed. 734 ].””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Although, lack of jurisdiction was suggested at the hearing, it is not pressed in the briefs submitted for the defendants.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.