Container Patents Corp. v. Stant’s Empirical Analysis
143 F.2d 170 · 1944
Citation profile
12 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently October 1992
12 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Mercoid Corporation v. Mid-Continent Inv Co · Carbice Corporation of America v. American Patents Development Corporation · Hutchinson v. Fidelity Inv. Ass'n · Ramming Real Estate Co. v. United States · New York Life Ins. v. Calhoun
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““As to this defense, it is sufficient to say that it was not presented to the court below and it cannot be presented here for the first time. New York Life Ins. Co. v. Calhoun, 8 Cir., 114 F.2d 526 , 543; Ramming Real Estate Co. v. United States, 8 Cir., 122 F.2d 892 ; Hutchinson v. Fidelity Investment Association, 4 Cir., 108 F.2d 431 , 436, 133 A.L.R. 1061 ; Towle v. Pullen, 7 Cir., 238 F. 107 , 111.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.