Cherry-Burrell Corp. v. Coe’s Empirical Analysis
143 F.2d 372 · 1944
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 7 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2008
12 federal appellate · 7 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Abbott v. Coe · Busell Trimmer Co. v. Stevens · Kirsch Mfg. Co. v. Gould Mersereau Co. · Minnesota Mining & Mfg. Co. v. Coe · Radtke Patents Corp. v. Coe
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Whenever any applicant is dissatisfied with the decision of the board of interference examiners”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hoover Co. v. Coe“Whenever a patent on application is refused by the Board of Appeals.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hoover Co. v. Coe
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.