Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

143 F.2d 595

Docket No. 10698.

Alford v. Addressograph-Multigraph Corp.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided June 2, 1944.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1944-06-02

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently November 1980

1 state decisions

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1944-06-02

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Carlos G. Stratton, of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.

¶2Lyon & Lyon, Leonard S. Lyon, and Lewis E. Lyon, all of Los Angeles, Cal., and George H. Wallace and Charles B. Cannon, both of Chicago, 111., for appellee.

¶3Before WILBUR, GARRECHT, and HEALY, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5Upon consideration of the stipulation of counsel for respective parties, and good cause therefor appearing, it is ordered that the appeal in above cause be dismissed with prejudice, and without costs to either party, that a judgment of dismissal be filed and entered accordingly and that the mandate of this Court in this cause issue forthwith.

/143/f2d/595 · .json · Public domain