Jackson v. Shanks’s Empirical Analysis
143 F.3d 1313 · 1998
Citation profile
26 federal appellate · 7 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 99 later decisions — most recently November 2018 · most notably Cummings v. Evans (1998), Dion Smallwood v. Gary Gibson Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma - (1999)
26 federal appellate · 7 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Batson v. Kentucky · Coleman v. Thompson · Brecht v. Abrahamson · Murray v. Carrier
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 99 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'deprived [petitioner] of fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution of the United States.'”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“affording deference to the state court's construction of state law.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Absent the opportunity to consult with new counsel to ascertain whether counsel in his direct criminal proceedings performed adequately or develop facts relating to his counsel's performance, the state's imposition of a procedural bar 'deprives [petitioner] of any meaningful review of his ineffective assistance claim.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.