Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 143 F.3d 428 - Telectronics Pacing Systems, Inc. v. Guidant Corp.

Telectronics Pacing Systems, Inc. v. Guidant Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

143 F.3d 428 · 1998

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
3
states following
July 2019
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 4 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently July 2019

10 federal appellate · 4 district · 3 state decisions

150199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp. · United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co. · At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications Workers · First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. Kaplan · American Safety Equipment Corp. v. J. P. Maguire & Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] matter should not be sent to arbitration unless there is a valid agreement to arbitrate and the underlying dispute falls within the scope of that agreement.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[A]ny doubts raised in construing contract language on arbitrability `should be resolved in favor of arbitration.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.