Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 143 F.3d 434 - Schiernbeck v. Davis

Schiernbeck v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis

143 F.3d 434 · 1998

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
November 2015
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently November 2015

1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

70199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Erie Co v. Tompkins · Sanders v. United States · Camfield Tires, Inc. v. Michelin Tire Corp. · Shroades v. Rental Homes, Inc. · Holloway v. Lockhart

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “parties to a motion for summary judgment cannot create sham issues of fact in an effort to defeat summary judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.