Dunn v. Sederakis’s Empirical Analysis
2015
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 215 · 29 U.S.C. § 2615 (§ 105 of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993)
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. White · Kramer v. Time Warner Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“it was 'a little bit ridiculous' that she was asking him to work 12-16 hour days when he was paid 'only for eight hours' " not sufficiently clear); Manfield v. Alutiiq Int'l Solutions, Inc. , 851 F.Supp.2d 196 , 206 (D. Me. 2012) (complaint about timesheet discrepancies without "voic[ing] an opinion”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“(1) participation in protected activity known to the defendant, like the filing of a FLSA lawsuit; (2) an employment action disadvantaging the plaintiff; and (3) a causal connection between the protected activity and the adverse employment action.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“This Court, however, is unprepared to hold that an explicit claim of illegality, as opposed to a clear articulation of facts indicative of illegality, is required for an oral complaint to support a claim of FLSA retaliation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.