Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 143 Ga. App. 734 - Jackson v. State

143 Ga. App. 734 - Jackson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
2
states following
January 1991
most recently cited

28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently January 1991 · most notably Crawford v. State (1980), Saylors v. State (1983)

28 state decisions

140197719801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Shy v. State · Johnston v. State · Jackson v. State · 128 Ga. App. 178 - Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Luther

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]hen a defendant on trial for murder admits the act but denies the intention to kill, Code Ann. § 26-1103 deserves special scrutiny ... Code Ann. § 26-1103 (b) provides: `A person commits involuntary manslaughter in the commission of a lawful act in an unlawful manner when he causes the death of another human being, without any intention to do so, by the commission of a lawful act in an unlawful manner likely to cause death or great bodily harm.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “the law enforcement officer [is] not interrogating [defendant] for the purpose of obtaining evidence to establish [his] guilt of a crime, but rather [is] seeking to determine the nature of the situation confronting him .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.