Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 143 KAN 708 - Butler v. Rumbeck

Butler v. Rumbeck’s Empirical Analysis

1936

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
July 1970
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently July 1970

5 state decisions

2019361940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Angell v. Martin · Smalley v. Bowling

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If a judgment become dormant it may be revived in the same manner as is prescribed for reviving actions before judgment at any time within two years after it becomes dormant.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.