Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 143 KAN 974 - Graham v. Pomeroy

Graham v. Pomeroy’s Empirical Analysis

1936

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
3
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently February 2019

19 state decisions

60193619401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ketchell v. Wilson & Co. · Klein v. McCullough

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When the time provided by statute within which to file a claim for compensation has passed, the right to recover compensation under the statute is lost and cannot be revived by subsequent voluntary payments of compensation by the employer.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “that notwithstanding the fact the time had gone by within which he could file his claim for compensation, and several months had elapsed, the fact his employer paid him something as compensation revived his lost right to file his claim and recover compensation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.