Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 143 MICH 355 - Jackson v. Mason

Jackson v. Mason’s Empirical Analysis

1906

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
3
states following
December 1937
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently December 1937

12 state decisions

701906191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Auditor General v. Sparrow · Williams v. Olson · Tucker v. Van Winkle

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We have held that, where a notice was based upon several years’ taxes, a notice giving the aggregate was proper. Williams v. Olson, 141 Mich. 580 ( 104 N. W. 1101 ) ; Tucker v. Van Winkle, 142 Mich. 210 ( 105 N. W. 607 ). This was for the reason that to repurchase, all taxes upon the description must be paid. Where, however, as in this case, there are various descriptions separately sold, the amount paid for each should be given in the notice, failing in which the notice is not a compliance with law.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.