Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

143 Misc. 244

Teplitzky v. Lippman

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · decided 1932-03-25

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently September 1936

Relies on Stoibor v. Marinacci

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1932-03-25

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1Service of the summons by leaving it at the office of the Secretary of State in the city of New York, coupled with compliance by plaintiff with the other provisions of section 52 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law (as amd. by Laws of 1930, chap. 57), sufficed to give the court jurisdiction of the defendants. (Stoibor v. Marinacci, 142 Misc. 345; affd., 235 App. Div. 714.)

¶2Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied.

¶3All concur; present, Lydon, Frankenthaler andUntermyer, JJ.

/143/misc/244 · .json · Public domain