Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 143 Miss. 231 - Prine v. State

Prine v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1926

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
3
states following
April 2003
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently April 2003 · most notably Pennington v. State (1987), MELVIN v. State (1950)

26 state decisions

60192619301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Interstate Commerce Commission v. Brimson · Cuddy · In re Nevitt · State ex inf. Crow v. Shepherd · Hurley v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “No other court [except the court against which the contempt was committed] has any authority to punish such a contempt. Statutes regulating the venue of trials of criminal offenses generally are inapplicable to contempt proceedings.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.