Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 143 MO 253 - Mansur & Tebbetts Implement Co v. Jones

Mansur & Tebbetts Implement Co v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis

1898

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
November 1936
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently November 1936

6 state decisions

2018981900191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Merry v. Fremon · State ex rel. Robertson v. Hope · Barton v. Sitlington · Boland v. Ross · Norton v. Highleyman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When a creditor, by fraud, will attempt to defeat the claims of other creditors, there is no hardship in postponing his demand, although a just one, to those which he has endeavored to defeat.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.