Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 143 Mont. 289 - State v. Lagge

State v. Lagge’s Empirical Analysis

1964

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
1
states following
April 1990
most recently cited

27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently April 1990 · most notably State v. Dunn (1970), State v. Logan (1970)

27 state decisions

1701964197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Keeler · State v. Gaimos · State v. Peterson · State v. Pankow · State v. Neely

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We have often held that it is not error for a trial court to refuse to give a requested instruction, or by implication a por -tion thereof, if the instruction’s legal theory was adequately covered by the instructions that were given and as long as the rights of the defendant were fully protected. (Citing authority).””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““It is not for us, an appellate court, to determine the credibility of the witness or to evaluate his testimony, rather, it is a function for a jury and their decision will not be disturbed by us without a clear showing in the record that either perjury, impeachment or extenuating circumstances were clearly present.” See also State v. Lagge, 143 Mont. 289 , 388 P.2d 792 ; State v. Walker, 148 Mont. 216 , 419 P.2d 300 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.