Manufacturing Co. v. . Summers’s Empirical Analysis
1906
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently February 2017
2 federal appellate · 7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“But the last mentioned rule does not apply in favor of a party who became bound on the instrument prior to the acquisition of such defective title.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bank v. . Walser“Every holder is deemed prima facie to be a holder in due course.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bank v. . Walser“infirmity in the instrument or defect in the title.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bank v. . Walser
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.