Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 143 N.C. 147 - Harrison v. Telegraph Co.

Harrison v. Telegraph Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1906

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
3
states following
March 1916
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Williams v. Telegraph Co. · Harrison v. Telegraph Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We think the learned counsel for the defendant takes a view much too restricted when he contends that the only purpose of the telegram was to notify the mother of the hour of the interment, and that nothing else was reasonably within the contemplation of the parties. The evident purpose was to notify the stricken mother at once that her son was dead, to the end that she might come without delay and have the melancholy pleasure, and perform the sacred duty, of being with his remains as long as possible before they were committed forever to the grave. “The fact that the hour fixed for the funeral is stated in the telegram is >a mere incident to the general purpose for which the telegram was evidently sent. ’ ’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.