Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 143 NCAPP 114 - State v. Hardison

State v. Hardison’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
February 2016
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Cuyler v. Sullivan · Wood v. Georgia · State v. Triplett · Weil v. . Herring · State v. Sharpe

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he six part inquiry [set out in Smith ] is very useful when an appellate court reviews the admission of hearsay under Rule 804(b)(5) or 803(24), ... its utility is diminished when an appellate court reviews the exclusion of hearsay,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[c]ommon sense dictates that if proffered evidence fails to meet the requirements of one of the inquiry steps, the trial judge's findings concerning the preceding steps are unnecessary.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.