Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 143 N.C. App. 307 - State v. Johnson

143 N.C. App. 307 - State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
4
states following
September 2016
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Illinois v. Gates · Bell v. Wolfish · Brinegar v. United States · Wilson v. Arkansas · State v. Arrington

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The scope of a search warrant is defined by the object of the search and place in which there is probable cause to believe the object will be found. The warrant in the case sub judice, was executed for the express purpose of procuring controlled substances likely to be found on the premises or on the persons described in the warrant, one of which was the defendant. Such substances could be readily concealed on the person so that they would not be found without a strip search. [ ] The scope of the search, while more intrusive than a search of the defendant’s outer clothing, was justified by the state’s interest in obtaining criminal evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.