Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 143 N.M. 668 - State v. Dombos

State v. Dombos’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
3
states following
February 2020
most recently cited

29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently February 2020 · most notably Muse v. Muse (2008), State v. Garcia (2009)

29 state decisions

210200820102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Blockburger v. United States · Swafford v. State · State v. Rojo · State v. Franklin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the defendant must show a compelling reason for the evaluation. A compelling reason exists when the probative value of the evidence reasonably likely to be obtained from the examination outweighs the prejudicial effect of such evidence and the [complaining witness's] right of privacy.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.