Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 143 N.M. 749 - State v. Ochoa

State v. Ochoa’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
1
states following
May 2024
most recently cited

2 district · 34 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently May 2024 · most notably State v. Ochoa (2008), State v. Marquez (2008)

2 district · 34 state decisions

160200820102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · United States v. Arvizu · State v. Rowell · State v. Urioste · State v. Vandenberg

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A. Members of the New Mexico state police, sheriffs and their salaried deputies and members of any municipal police force, may arrest without warrant any person: (1) present at the scene of a motor vehicle accident; (2) on a highway when charged with theft of a motor vehicle; or (3) charged with crime in another jurisdiction, upon receipt of a message giving the name or a reasonably accurate description of the person wanted, the crime alleged and a statement he is likely to flee the jurisdiction of the state. B. To arrest without warrant, the arresting officer must have reasonable grounds, based on personal investigation which may include information from eyewitnesses, to believe the person arrested has committed a crime.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “to determine whether the stop was pretextual and, if so, whether article II, section 10 prohibits pretextual stops.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution does not protect citizens against pretextual stops,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.