Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 143 Ohio App. 3d 102 - Sayyah v. Cutrell

143 Ohio App. 3d 102 - Sayyah v. Cutrell’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
1
states following
September 2024
most recently cited

28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently September 2024 · most notably Swiss Reinsurance America Corp. v. Roetzel & Andress (2005), Ireton v. JTD Realty Investments, L.L.C. (2010)

28 state decisions

150200120102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Dresher v. Burt · Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co. · Krahn v. Kinney · Scholler v. Scholler · Simon v. Zipperstein

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “privity between a third person and the client exists where the client and the third person share a mutual or successive right of property or other interest.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “an attorney advises others as to their *Page 16 legal rights, a method to be pursued, the forum to be selected, and the practice to be followed for the enforcement of their rights.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “A lawyer employed or retained by a corporation or similar entity owes his allegiance to the entity and not to a stockholder, director, officer, employee, representative, or other person connected with the entity. In advising the entity, a lawyer should keep paramount its interests and his professional judgment should not be influenced by the personal desires of any person or organization.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.