143 Ohio App. 3d 132 - State v. Puckett’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently July 2025
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Schiebel · Hartt v. Munobe · State ex rel. Richard v. Seidner · Sharp v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. · State v. Matthews
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“consideration to `original papers and exhibits thereto filed in the trial court.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“* * * presume that the judgment and proceedings below were valid unless an error affirmatively appears on the record.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.