143 Ohio App. 3d 215 - Noe v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
23 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently May 2024
23 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Mitchell v. Lawson Milk Co. · 101 Ohio App. 3d 760 - Hunt v. Marksman Products, Division of S/R Industries, Inc. · Tulloh v. Goodyear Atomic Corp. · 85 Ohio App. 3d 513 - Steiner v. Steiner · Cecil v. Cottrill
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“beyond doubt from the complaint that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts entitling him to recovery.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“A motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted is procedural and tests the sufficiency of the complaint.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[The plaintiff] never sought to amend her complaint to include * * * an allegation [to support a tolling argument]. On the face of Noe's complaint, it is obvious that she did not bring her complaint within two years following the alleged injury. * * * Because a trial court is confined to the facts alleged in the complaint when faced with a Civ.R. 12(B)(6) motion to dismiss, and because it appears beyond a doubt from the face of the complaint that Noe can prove no set of facts that would entitle her to relief, we find that the trial court did not err in dismissing Noe's complaint,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Gore v. Mohamod
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.