Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 143 Ohio App. 3d 583 - State v. Glavic

143 Ohio App. 3d 583 - State v. Glavic’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
August 2025
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently August 2025

21 state decisions

100200120102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · State v. Bradley · State v. Adams · State v. Xie · State v. Smith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “there is a reasonable and legitimate basis for the withdrawal of the plea.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[a] defendant does not have an absolute right to withdraw a guilty plea prior to sentencing.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “To successfully assert ineffective assistance of counsel, appellant must show that the attorney made errors so serious that he or she was not functioning as `counsel' as guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment, and appellant must show that he or she was prejudiced by the deficient performance. In other words, appellant must show `that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different. A reasonable probability is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.