143 Ohio App. 3d 601 - State v. Duran’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

18 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “After judgment has been rendered against surety or after securities sold or cash bail applied, the court or magistrate, on the appearance, surrender, or rearrest of the accused on the charge, may remit all or such portion of the penalty as it deems just * * *.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Slider · State v. Bates

2. “(1) the circumstances surrounding the reappearance of the accused, including timing and whether that reappearance was voluntary; (2) the reasons for the accused's failure to appear; (3) the inconvenience, expense, delay, and prejudice to the prosecution caused by the accused's disappearance; (4) whether the surety was instrumental in securing the appearance of the accused; (5) any mitigating circumstances; and (6) whether justice requires the total amount of the bond remain forfeited. [ State v. Am. Bail Bond Agency , 129 Ohio App.3d 708 , 712-713, 719 N.E.2d 13 (1998) ]; State v. Duran (2001), 143 Ohio App.3d 601 , 604, 758 N.E.2d 742 .”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Bates

3. “Overall, the bond forfeiture should bear a reasonable relationship to the costs and inconvenience in regaining custody of the accused and again preparing for trial.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Gaston, L-08-1063 (1-9-2009)