143 Ohio App. 3d 669 - Harness v. Harness’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently June 2020
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State ex rel. Steckman v. Jackson · Bell v. Mt. Sinai Medical Center · Polikoff v. Adam · In re Miller · 87 Ohio App. 3d 207 - Production Credit Association v. Hedges
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[p]rior to trial, the court may cause an investigation to be made as to the character, family relations, past conduct, earning ability, and financial worth of each parent and may order the parents and their minor children to submit to medical, psychological, and psychiatric examinations. The report of the investigation and examinations shall be made available to either parent or the parent's counsel of record not less than five days before trial, upon written request. The report shall be signed by the investigator, and the investigator shall be subject to cross-examination by either parent concerning the contents of the report. The court may tax as costs all or any part of the expenses for each investigation.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Appellant relies on Shoff v. Shoff, 1995 Ohio App. LEXIS 3145 , (July 27, 1995), Franklin App. No. 95APF01-8, unreported, 1995 WL 450249 , as authority for the proposition that in the context of custody proceedings, a trial court's Civ.R. 35 order for a psychological evaluation is final and appealable. We are not convinced that, under the facts of the case sub judice, appellant will suffer harm if the court's expert conducts these psychological evaluations. Further, whatever harm might ensue can be corrected by an appeal from the final order after the trial court resolves all of the issues. Montecalvo v. Montecalvo (1999), 126 Ohio App. 3d 377 , 710 N.E.2d 379 . Accordingly, appellant has failed to establish that her and her son's substantial rights have been affected by the trial court's August 4 and September 7 orders * * *.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“(a) The order in effect determines the action with respect to the provisional remedy and prevents a judgment in the action in favor of the appealing party with respect to the provisional remedy. {¶ 22}”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.