143 Ohio App. 3d 720 - Pyles v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

15 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “the representative have proper standing. In order to have standing to sue as a class representative, the plaintiff must possess the same interest and suffer the same injury shared by all members of the class that he or she seeks to represent.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Piro v. National City Bank, Unpublished Decision (1-29-2004) · Piro v. National City Bank, Unpublished Decision (1-29-2004)

2. “one or more members of a class may sue or be sued as representative parties on behalf of all only if * * * the class is so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable * * *.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Piro v. National City Bank, Unpublished Decision (1-29-2004) · Piro v. National City Bank, Unpublished Decision (1-29-2004)

3. “determine predominance by comparing the time that the common issues can be anticipated to consume in the litigation to the time that individual issues will require. Otherwise only the most complex common questions could predominate since such issues tend to require more time to litigate than less complex issues.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Stammco, L.L.C. v. United Tel. Co. of Ohio, F-07-024 (8-1-2008)